The "Official"

G Spot Website

Announcing "The G Spot in Focus (E-Book)

Innovative G-Spot Photography by Jim Thomsen

The Scientific Progress by John Perry, PhD

And MUCH more!   ©2006

 

 


             Tell your friends you helped finance the "G" spot  Donate $1 for G Spot Research
Finance the G Spot Research! 

Home Up Vagina The UFO Debate Ejaculation Orgasms PC Muscle Reviews

Visit Our On-Line Store:

Want Better Orgasms?

Get Better Muscles!


New Email List

archives.gif (956 bytes)
Old
Archives


Ernst Gräfenberg



JimThomsen


Pelvic EMG


Prof. M. Zaviacic

1982 Edition
The G Spot book.gif (5149 bytes)
At Amazon.com   


DoctorG


Dr. Alfred Kinsey
 

wpe77.jpg (10995 bytes)
Who IS
"Dr. G Spot"?

CHAT
ROOM

 

REUTERS
08.29.01

The G-spot: A gynecological UFO?

NEW YORK, Aug 29 (Reuters Health) -- Despite widespread belief in the G-spot, there is little evidence to support its existence, according to a new report.

'The scientific evidence that is usually cited to support the existence of a G-spot is so inadequate to be almost laughable,' Dr. Terrence M. Hines from Pace University in Pleasantville, New York, told Reuters Health.

The G-spot, believed to be a bundle of nerve tissue in the vagina that, when stimulated, intensifies sexual arousal, is named for Dr. Ernest Grafenberg, who first described it in a 1950 article in the International Journal of Sexology. However, Grafenberg did not present any clinical evidence for the existence of the G-spot, only anecdotes about some of his female patients and their sexual behaviors, Hines notes.

The term 'G-spot' was first mentioned in 1982 in the book 'The 'G-Spot' and Other Discoveries About Human Sexuality,' by Ladas et al. 'I am not sure how these authors got from the Grafenberg paper to the G-spot, which they cite in their book,' Hines said.

In his report published in the August issue of the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hines reviews the evidence for the existence of the G-spot and concludes that it is 'a sort of gynecological UFO: much searched for, much discussed, but unverified by objective means.'

The few studies dealing with the existence of the G-spot have been poorly done, Hines points out. 'This science, or pseudoscience, for the existence of a G-spot is based entirely on a handful of females who were examined behaviorally to see if a G-spot existed. And only 4 of 12 women had behavioral evidence for a G-spot,' he stressed.

In addition, if there was a G-spot, it would have to have a detailed and rich area of neurons. Studies of the interior vaginal wall have failed to find a hint of such a structure, Hines said. 'If it was there they probably would not have missed it,' he added.

'Women have been misled for about 20 years about an important part of their sexuality,' Hines noted. 'Some women might feel very bad about themselves and their sexuality if they can't find the G-spot--but there is nothing there to find.'

 

SOURCE: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2001;185:359-362.

Copyright 2000 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.


 

Gain access to Dr. Susan Block's website

Appendix A
Other
    Organizations
  

AAMFT

BCIA

Bioenergetic Analysis

SIECUS

Other Good
GSpot Webs

will be listed here.  (Send your suggestions to DrGSpot@DrGSpot.net)